All Nonfiction
- Bullying
- Books
- Academic
- Author Interviews
- Celebrity interviews
- College Articles
- College Essays
- Educator of the Year
- Heroes
- Interviews
- Memoir
- Personal Experience
- Sports
- Travel & Culture
All Opinions
- Bullying
- Current Events / Politics
- Discrimination
- Drugs / Alcohol / Smoking
- Entertainment / Celebrities
- Environment
- Love / Relationships
- Movies / Music / TV
- Pop Culture / Trends
- School / College
- Social Issues / Civics
- Spirituality / Religion
- Sports / Hobbies
All Hot Topics
- Bullying
- Community Service
- Environment
- Health
- Letters to the Editor
- Pride & Prejudice
- What Matters
- Back
Summer Guide
- Program Links
- Program Reviews
- Back
College Guide
- College Links
- College Reviews
- College Essays
- College Articles
- Back
Replicating Mankind: 'The Thing' (1982) vs. 'Invasion of the Body Snatchers' (1956)
Summary:
This is an in-depth look into the stories, atmospheres, and themes of both John Carpenter's, The Thing, and Don Siegel's, Invasion of the Body Snatchers. Though predicated on a similar idea, each film explores the horrific notion of human emulation quite differently. Taking a more cynical approach in its examination of man, The Thing presents a research crew's gradual descent into paranoia and their bitter loss of trust in one another. With no actualized or identifiable monster to lay blame on, the film becomes an exploration of man placed under pressure. Invasion of the Body Snatchers, however, presents a timely defense of man's special uniqueness and worthwhile individuality. During an era of mistrust and accusations in America (whether in politics or the film industry), the film makes a bold stance against social coercion and an ode to the vitalized man.
Evan F.
Replicating Mankind: 'The Thing' (1982) vs. 'Invasion of the Body Snatchers' (1956)
Similar books
JOIN THE DISCUSSION
This book has 0 comments.