All Nonfiction
- Bullying
- Books
- Academic
- Author Interviews
- Celebrity interviews
- College Articles
- College Essays
- Educator of the Year
- Heroes
- Interviews
- Memoir
- Personal Experience
- Sports
- Travel & Culture
All Opinions
- Bullying
- Current Events / Politics
- Discrimination
- Drugs / Alcohol / Smoking
- Entertainment / Celebrities
- Environment
- Love / Relationships
- Movies / Music / TV
- Pop Culture / Trends
- School / College
- Social Issues / Civics
- Spirituality / Religion
- Sports / Hobbies
All Hot Topics
- Bullying
- Community Service
- Environment
- Health
- Letters to the Editor
- Pride & Prejudice
- What Matters
- Back
Summer Guide
- Program Links
- Program Reviews
- Back
College Guide
- College Links
- College Reviews
- College Essays
- College Articles
- Back
Where Words Fail, Music Speaks
If you talk to a group of teenagers about music for a long enough period of time, chances are you’ll here someone say something along the lines of “I hate (insert popular musician here) because they only make songs to sell.”
This is one of the most immature, and unfounded opinions present in today’s youth. It is quite obvious that professional musicians will “make songs to sell”. They depend on their music to sell. The problem is that most people don’t take logic a step further and infer that “Well, good music sells. So that means they try and make good music”. The problem is that these people are of the opinion that their idea of good music is either
A)The majority
B)More “artistic and expressive”
C)Or better because of some similarity to older music
The problem with thinking you’re the majority is that the most popular (and selling) music is obviously the type the majority favors. The type of people that use argument B are usually not even educated in music or have some self-fabricated objective standards of art. Most of these people argue that art is about “expressing yourself” and that if a song doesn’t talk about some heart-breaking tragedy with lots of light melodic parts then it is not “self expressive” enough. The assertion that your music is better because of a similarity to older music is often false, and if not it is still pretentiously assuming that older music is better.
I’ve heard people say that older music is better because it is quiet and more mathematical, this is completely wrong. Most of those people assume that classical, Baroque-Era orchestra music is the only type of older music. Tons of music genres existed that were similar to the modern genres such as hip-hop. Just like in nightclubs today, people in bars and taverns would usually listen to upbeat music with fast, distinct, lead melodies and layers of supporting bass and percussion. Folk music is often very similar to hip-hop, with lots of faster, consistent beats and melodies.
The argument that art is about expressing your personality is completely wrong. Art, by denotation, is the “quality, production, expression, or realm, according to aesthetic principles, of what is beautiful, appealing, or of more than ordinary significance.” – Dictionary.com, so by definition art does not have to be about expressing yourself. However even in an emotional sense art doesn’t have to express characteristics of the artist. Actors have to change the personality they’re portraying all the time, novelists make up characters that are utterly unlike they themselves. Art isn't about expressing yourself all the time; it’s about eliciting an emotion or series of emotions from the audience. Art is about manipulating the feelings of your audience to reach a desired effect that will provoke some kind of thought process or surge of emotion. Music doesn’t always have to mean something about the artist, as long as it means something to the audience, and that something can be a lot of different things.
Music isn’t always about telling a story, it’s about making you feel something.
“Where Words Fail, Music Speaks” ~ Hans Christian Anderson
Similar Articles
JOIN THE DISCUSSION
This article has 11 comments.
1. Don't listen to stupid music, listen to some good newer genre music like house or dubstep or something.
2. Oh, well then I guess you have no excuse :P
1) What does Lady GaGa's gender have to do with anything? That's completely irrelevant, prejudiced and has nothing to do with what I was saying in the article.
2) How is music today ruined, it's almost the same as it has ever been. The difference is only in what type of instrumentation we use.
Also, I'm sorry if this sounds mean or isn't true, but you don't sound like a teenager. This website is meant for teens mostly, and getting in opinion articles and debates with people who are teenagers (if you're not one) is going to be hard on you. I'm 15, and I don't know what age you are and I don't really care but if you're 12 or something then this really isn't fair and I recommend you stay away from debates like this until you get a little more time to mature and get more information. I know I needed to wait before getting into arguments when I was young.
Anyways, please don't rate down people's articles just because you're mad at them. That's called flaming, nobody likes that.